All art could be or was viewed as disturbing or pornographic at one point or another. But I guess we should put clothes of David and burn Manet's Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe. After all, think of the children!
I would think it's the duty of the parent, not the artist and museums to educate the child on the difference between porn and art.
Originally Posted by LostNYC
Originally Posted by Jamo
Art patrons should be able to file malpractice lawsuits against crappy art
LOL I love it!!!
Yeah, if that ever came to pass, I would love to see your reaction when a patron decides your work is crappy for some silly reason and sues you. :/
Art is subjective. -.- What's crap now could be brilliant 10 years ago or 10 years later.